Lara Smejkal vs Laura Maser Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jun at 07:01 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Smejkal vs L. Maser

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Smejkal 1 - 0 Maser
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lara Smejkal winning 2 and Laura Maser winning 0. The last match between Lara Smejkal and Laura Maser was at the W35 Klosters, 15-06-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Lara Smejkal getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Smejkal | 1 |
| Maser | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W35 Klosters(06-15-25)
L. Smejkal vs L. Maser H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 44.04% (48-61) | Career Total W/L | 44.44% (4-5) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Smejkal vs L. Maser Match Preview:
- Can recent second serve performance decide the outcome? In the last six months, Smejkal has won 44.57% of second serve points, whereas Maser has not won any.
- How do they fare in return games? Recently, Smejkal has won 48.85% of their opponent's second serve points and 29.13% of first serve returns, compared to Maser's 0% in both categories.
- Facing pressure, what is the breakpoint defense? Smejkal saved 53.23% of breakpoints, while Maser has saved none.
- Overall performance comparison: Over the past year, Smejkal has a 51.22% match win rate, whereas Maser maintains a 50% win rate.
- Surface performance insight: Smejkal's best career surface is I.hard (67% win rate), while Maser excels on Hard surfaces with a 50% win rate.
- Player level experience: Smejkal has a 57.69% win rate at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events over the past year; Maser has a 50% win rate at the same level.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Smejkal faced opponents with an average ranking of 330.07, while Maser did not provide enough data for ranking comparisons.
- What happens if the match reaches a deciding set? Smejkal has won 43% of deciding sets in the past year, contrasting Maser's perfect 100% record.
- Is breakpoint conversion a critical factor? Recently, Smejkal converted 38.89% of breakpoints, while Maser again stands at 0%.
Editorial Prediction (June 15, 2025, UTC):
In this upcoming tennis match, noticeable differences in player performance indicate a competitive edge. Smejkal has consistently shown stronger second serve and return games, giving them an advantage in rally situations.
Under pressure, Smejkal's ability to save breakpoints likely improves their chances, while Maser struggles in this area. Furthermore, Smejkal demonstrates a better track record in converting breakpoints into victories.
Despite Maser's superior record in deciding sets, the match's precedence highlights Smejkal's broader competitive experience and success against higher-ranked opponents.
Considering these factors, Smejkal appears to be the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Lara Smejkal vs Laura Maser Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Smejkal vs L. Maser H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:13:20 | Average Match Time | 1:13:20 |
| 60% (25/42) | 1st Serve % | 45% (24/53) |
| 84% (21/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 59% (10/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (30/53) | Return Points Win % | 26% (11/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Smejkal Recent Matches Played
L. Maser Recent Matches Played

L. Smejkal vs L. Maser Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.04% (48/61) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 45.16% (112/136) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.86% (9/12) |
| 48.94% (1155/1205) | Games Win/Loss | 49.74% (94/95) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 42.86% (39/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 199 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 239 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:4:41 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 362.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 54% (2490/4574) | 1st Serve % | 45% (24/53) |
| 63% (1569/2490) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 44% (923/2084) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 45% (212/468) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 42% (1879/4517) | Return Points Win % | 26% (11/42) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.50% (18/30) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.85% (30/29) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 44% (47/107) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (8/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (14/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 85% (48/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 15% (48/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 11% (61/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (6/2) |